Thanks. I will add this as a milestone to 2.49.0.

On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 11:21 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev <valen...@google.com>
wrote:

> > Absent a compelling reason otherwise, my view would be to just stick
> with the statement of dropping it as soon as it goes out of support
>
> This is the process we agreed upon last time we discussed the version
> support policy on dev@.
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 6:18 PM Robert Bradshaw via dev <
> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 6:27 AM Anand Inguva via dev <dev@beam.apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> Is there a significant gain in dropping 3.7 support before the cut?
>> >
>> > No, I think it is just a matter of how soon we want to do it.
>>
>> Absent a compelling reason otherwise, my view would be to just stick
>> with the statement of dropping it as soon as it goes out of support,
>> but not sooner. Yeah, it's only a matter of a couple of weeks, but the
>> subsequent release isn't far behind.
>>
>> > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:11 PM Ritesh Ghorse <riteshgho...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 to get target for 2.48.0
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 11:33 AM Jack McCluskey via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd suggest shooting for 2.48.0 so we're ahead of the end-of-support
>> date. We're also supporting 5 different Python versions in 2.47.0, it's
>> probably for the best to try and pare that down.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 11:25 AM Anand Inguva via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks Ritesh!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Python 3.7 support is going to end on June 27th 2023. Beam 2.48.0
>> may get released ~1-2 weeks earlier of that date.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My question here is should we target 2.48.0 or 2.49.0 to stop
>> supporting Python 3.7 for beam?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Anand
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:25 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thank you!  @Ahmet Altay
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:17 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> It is every 6 weeks. There is also a published calendar for
>> release branch cut dates:
>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouani...@group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:13 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I just saw another thread about the vote of 2.47.0 release, just
>> curious to know what is beam's release cadence, is it monthly?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 1:58 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Excellent, thank you!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:21 AM Ahmet Altay via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you Ritesh!
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:00 AM Ritesh Ghorse via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The next release branch 2.48.0 cut is scheduled for May 17th,
>> according to
>> >>>>>>>>>> the release calendar [1].
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I would like to volunteer myself to do this release. I'll cut
>> the branch on the scheduled date, and cherrypick release-blocking fixes
>> later.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Please help me make sure the release goes smoothly by:
>> >>>>>>>>>> - Making sure that any unresolved release blocking issues for
>> 2.48.0 have their "Milestone" marked as "2.48.0 Release".
>> >>>>>>>>>> - Reviewing the current release blockers [2] and remove the
>> Milestone if they don't meet the criteria at [3].
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouani...@group.calendar.google.com
>> >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/milestone/12
>> >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/release-blocking/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Ritesh Ghorse
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Best Regards
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Jeff Zhang
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Best Regards
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jeff Zhang
>>
>

Reply via email to