This PR was later reverted due to issues it caused in the Python X-lang wrapper. I've had a look and I can't work out what the issue is. Would someone be able to lend a hand? Pablo, you seem to have a lot of experience with Debezium?
Judah On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 01:38, Luke Cwik <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this was a double post as I merged an upgrade a couple of days ago. > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:02 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Judah, >> you should have received an invite for Slack. Let me know if you were >> able to access it. >> >> I think it makes sense to update our Debezium dependency - would you be >> willing to make the pull request to make the update? If you make it in the >> next couple of days, we can have it updated on time for Beam 2.34.0. >> Let me know if you don't have the time so I can pick that up instead. >> Best >> -P. >> >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:47 PM Judah Rand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I identified the other day that Debezium does not work with many cloud >>> providers Postgres instances. This includes Azure and Google CloudSQL. I >>> determined that this is due to the version of Postgres JDBC that Debezium >>> uses (42.2.14). >>> >>> I've been working with the Debezium devs to update this dependency to >>> 42.2.22 which should solve the connection problems. This dependency update >>> should be released imminently in Debezium 1.7.0.Final (today or Monday I >>> suspect). >>> >>> See: >>> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DBZ-4060 >>> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/1868 >>> >>> However, this means that for the DebeziumIO connector dependency in >>> Apache Beam will also need updating. Is this something which people will be >>> happy with? >>> >>> Is it something which could likely be included in the next Beam release? >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> Judah >>> >>> PS. Any chance I could get invited to the ASF Slack? >>> >>
