+1 for using the term connectors.

JB, thanks for agreeing to add content to this section.

- Cham

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:48 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:

> I like this idea and also the first option. I agree with making it clear
> that things about IO are language specific.
>
> And +1 to calling it connectors or anything else that will resonate with
> end users.
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Agree, I think connector is a more meaning name for users.
>>
>> IO is more the Beam "internal" wording.
>>
>> I will update this section as I have new connectors ( :) ) on the fly.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 26/10/2018 04:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>> > My $0.02
>> >
>> > "IO" has an established meaning in Beam dev argot but I think on the web
>> > page I would use the word "connector" or something more universal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM Chamikara Jayalath <
>> [email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >     (1) Add a top level IO roadmap.
>> >
>> >
>> > I like this, but it is important on the roadmap to be very clear about
>> > language / SDK.
>> >
>> >
>> >     (2) Add IO roadmap sub-sections under each SDK instead of at top
>> level.
>> >
>> >
>> > This seems OK to me too. If you are a user and you have some data you
>> > just want to see if it is going to be accessible to you soon. You
>> > probably already committed to a language.
>> >
>> >
>> >     (3) We don't need a IO roadmap since we already have
>> >     https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/
>> >
>> >
>> > I think the roadmap / in-progress part should move to the new Roadmap
>> > and/or the wiki.
>> >
>> > Kenn
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     WDYT ?
>> >
>> >     Thanks,
>> >     Cham
>> >
>> >
>> >     ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> >     From: *Chamikara Jayalath* <[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >     Date: Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:07 PM
>> >     Subject: Re: [apache/beam] [Website] Add roadmap at top level
>> (#6718)
>> >     To: apache/beam <[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >     Cc: Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>, Your activity
>> >     <[email protected]
>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >
>> >
>> >     Ok. Makes sense. Kenn and others, WDYT ? We can start writing down a
>> >     roadmap for IO if there's no objection. It can include more details
>> >     about some of the proposed IO mentioned in
>> >     https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/ as well as
>> >     information on upcoming major IO related efforts such as
>> >     cross-language IO support and SDF (in addition to what will be
>> >     available in portability roadmap for these features).
>> >
>> >     —
>> >     You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
>> >     Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> >     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6718#issuecomment-433262537>,
>> >     or mute the thread
>> >     <
>> https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKUZEUcsbL6bhjOfeRiNZmqtab3PDWBjks5uom5KgaJpZM4Xj9s1
>> >.
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to