Hi,

I don't have the issue ;)

As said in my vote, I tested 2.7.0 RC1 on beam-samples with Spark
without problem.

I don't reproduce Romain issue as well.

@Romain can you provide some details to reproduce the issue ?

Regards
JB

On 17/09/2018 19:17, Charles Chen wrote:
> Luke, Maximillian, Raghu, can you please propose cherry-pick PRs to the
> release-2.7.0 for your issues and add me as a reviewer (@charlesccychen)?
> 
> Romain, JB: is there any way I can help with debugging the issue you're
> facing so we can unblock the release?
> 
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM Raghu Angadi <rang...@google.com
> <mailto:rang...@google.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I would like propose one more cherrypick for RC2
>     : https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6391
>     This is a KafkaIO bug fix. Once a user hits this bug, there is no
>     easy work around for them, especially on Dataflow. Only work around
>     in Dataflow is to restart or reload the job.
> 
>     The fix itself fairly safe and is tested.
>     Raghu.
> 
>     On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:52 AM Alexey Romanenko
>     <aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Perhaps it could help, but I run simple WordCount (built with
>         Beam 2.7) on YARN/Spark (HDP Sandbox) cluster and it worked fine
>         for me.
> 
>>         On 14 Sep 2018, at 06:56, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>         <rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Charles,
>>
>>         I didn't get enough time to check deeply but it is clearly a
>>         dependency issue and it is not in beam spark runner itself but
>>         in another transitive module of beam. It does not happen in
>>         existing spark test cause none of them are in a cluster (even
>>         just with 1 worker) but this seems to be a regression since
>>         2.6 works OOTB.
>>
>>         Romain Manni-Bucau
>>         @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>         <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>         <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github
>>         <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>         <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>         
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>
>>
>>         Le jeu. 13 sept. 2018 à 22:15, Charles Chen <c...@google.com
>>         <mailto:c...@google.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>             Romain and JB, can you please add the results of your
>>             investigations into the errors you've seen above?  Given
>>             that the existing SparkRunner tests pass for this RC, and
>>             that the integration test you ran is in another repo that
>>             is not continuously tested with Beam, it is not clear how
>>             we should move forward and whether this is a blocking
>>             issue, unless we can find a root cause in Beam.
>>
>>             On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:08 AM Etienne Chauchot
>>             <echauc...@apache.org <mailto:echauc...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Hi all,
>>
>>                 on a performance and functional regression stand point
>>                 I see no regression:
>>
>>                 I looked at nexmark graphs "output pcollection size"
>>                 and "execution time" around release cut date on
>>                 dataflow, spark, flink and direct runner in batch and
>>                 streaming modes. There seems to be no regression.
>>
>>                 Etienne
>>
>>                 Le mardi 11 septembre 2018 à 12:25 -0700, Charles Chen
>>                 a écrit :
>>>                 The SparkRunner validation test
>>>                 (here: 
>>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/release-guide/#run-validation-tests)
>>>                 passes on my machine.  It looks like we are likely
>>>                 missing test coverage where Romain is hitting issues.
>>>
>>>                 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:15 PM Ahmet Altay
>>>                 <al...@google.com <mailto:al...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>                 Could anyone else help with looking at these issues
>>>>                 earlier?
>>>>
>>>>                 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>                 <rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>                 <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>                 Im running this main [1] through this IT [2]. Was
>>>>>                 working fine since ~1 year but 2.7.0 broke it.
>>>>>                 Didnt investigate more but can have a look later
>>>>>                 this month if it helps.
>>>>>
>>>>>                 [1] 
>>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/main/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/clusterserialization/Main.java
>>>>>                 [2] 
>>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/test/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/SerializationOverClusterIT.java
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 20:54, Charles Chen
>>>>>                 <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>> a écrit :
>>>>>>                 Romain: can you give more details on the failure
>>>>>>                 you're encountering, i.e. how you are performing
>>>>>>                 this validation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:36 AM Jean-Baptiste
>>>>>>                 Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>
>>>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>>>>                 Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                 weird, I didn't have it on Beam samples. Let me
>>>>>>>                 try to reproduce and I
>>>>>>>                 will create the Jira.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                 Regards
>>>>>>>                 JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                 On 11/09/2018 11:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>                 > -1, seems spark integration is broken (tested
>>>>>>>                 with spark 2.3.1 and 2.2.1):
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 > 18/09/11 11:33:29 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost
>>>>>>>                 task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0, RMANNIBUCAU,
>>>>>>>                 executor 0): java.lang.ClassCastException: cannot
>>>>>>>                 assign instance of
>>>>>>>                 scala.collection.immutable.List$SerializationProxy to
>>>>>>>                 fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/>
>>>>>>>                 <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org
>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/>>$apache$spark$rdd$RDD$$dependencies_
>>>>>>>                 of type scala.collection.Seq in instance of
>>>>>>>                 org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD
>>>>>>>                 >       at
>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> java.io.ObjectStreamClass$FieldReflector.setObjFieldValues(ObjectStreamClass.java:2233)
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 > Also the issue Lukasz identified is important
>>>>>>>                 even if workarounds can be
>>>>>>>                 > put in place so +1 to fix it as well if possible.
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>                 > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>                 | Blog
>>>>>>>                 > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>                 > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>                 <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> | Github
>>>>>>>                 > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>                 > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 20:48, Lukasz Cwik
>>>>>>>                 <lc...@google.com <mailto:lc...@google.com>
>>>>>>>                 > <mailto:lc...@google.com
>>>>>>>                 <mailto:lc...@google.com>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >     I found an issue where we are no longer
>>>>>>>                 packaging the pom.xml within
>>>>>>>                 >     the artifact jars at
>>>>>>>                 META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId. More details
>>>>>>>                 >     in
>>>>>>>                 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5351.
>>>>>>>                 I wouldn't
>>>>>>>                 >     consider this a blocker but it was an easy fix
>>>>>>>                 >     (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6358)
>>>>>>>                 and users may rely on the
>>>>>>>                 >     pom.xml.
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >     Should we recut the release candidate to
>>>>>>>                 include this?
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >     On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:58 AM
>>>>>>>                 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>                 >     <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>>>                 <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>                 <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >         +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >         Tested successfully on Beam Samples.
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >         Thanks !
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >         Regards
>>>>>>>                 >         JB
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >         On 07/09/2018 23:56, Charles Chen wrote:
>>>>>>>                 >          > Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>                 >          >
>>>>>>>                 >          > Please review and vote on the
>>>>>>>                 release candidate #1 for the
>>>>>>>                 >         version
>>>>>>>                 >          > 2.7.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>                 >          > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>                 >          > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
>>>>>>>                 (please provide specific
>>>>>>>                 >         comments)
>>>>>>>                 >          >
>>>>>>>                 >          > The complete staging area is
>>>>>>>                 available for your review, which
>>>>>>>                 >         includes:
>>>>>>>                 >          > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>                 >          > * the official Apache source release
>>>>>>>                 to be deployed to
>>>>>>>                 >         dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://dist.apache.org/> <http://dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://dist.apache.org/>>
>>>>>>>                 >          > <http://dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2], which is signed
>>>>>>>                 with the key with
>>>>>>>                 >          > fingerprint 45C60AAAD115F560 [3],
>>>>>>>                 >          > * all artifacts to be deployed to
>>>>>>>                 the Maven Central
>>>>>>>                 >         Repository [4],
>>>>>>>                 >          > * source code tag "v2.7.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>>>>                 >          > * website pull request listing the
>>>>>>>                 release and publishing the API
>>>>>>>                 >          > reference manual [6].
>>>>>>>                 >          > * Java artifacts were built with
>>>>>>>                 Gradle 4.8 and OpenJDK
>>>>>>>                 >          > 1.8.0_181-8u181-b13-1~deb9u1-b13.
>>>>>>>                 >          > * Python artifacts are deployed
>>>>>>>                 along with the source release
>>>>>>>                 >         to the
>>>>>>>                 >          > dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://dist.apache.org/> <http://dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://dist.apache.org/>>
>>>>>>>                 >         <http://dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2].
>>>>>>>                 >          >
>>>>>>>                 >          > The vote will be open for at least
>>>>>>>                 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>                 >         majority
>>>>>>>                 >          > approval, with at least 3 PMC
>>>>>>>                 affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>                 >          >
>>>>>>>                 >          > Thanks,
>>>>>>>                 >          > Charles
>>>>>>>                 >          >
>>>>>>>                 >          > [1]
>>>>>>>                 >          >
>>>>>>>                 >       
>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12343654
>>>>>>>                 >          > [2]
>>>>>>>                 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.7.0
>>>>>>>                 >          > [3]
>>>>>>>                 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>                 >          > [4]
>>>>>>>                 >       
>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/
>>>>>>>                 >          > [5]
>>>>>>>                 https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.7.0-RC1
>>>>>>>                 >          > [6]
>>>>>>>                 https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/549
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>>>>                 >         --
>>>>>>>                 >         Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>                 >         jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>                 <mailto:jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>>>                 <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>                 >         http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>                 <http://blog.nanthrax.net/>
>>>>>>>                 >         Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>                 <http://www.talend.com/>
>>>>>>>                 >
>>>>
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to