The license inclusion issue that was brought up on the thread has been resolved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4393.
JB, you find any other release related issues? On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:33 AM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe JB is referring to > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4060 > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:16 AM Scott Wegner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> J.B., can you give any context on what metadata is missing? Is there a >> JIRA? >> >> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:30 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The build was OK yesterday but the maven-metadata is still missing. >>> >>> That's the point to fix before being able to move forward on the >>> release. >>> >>> I gonna tackle this later today. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 05/18/2018 02:41 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: >>> > Hi JB and all, >>> > >>> > I wanted to follow up on my previous email. The python streaming issue >>> I >>> > mentioned is resolved and removed from the blocker list. Blocker list >>> is empty >>> > now. You can go ahead with the release branch cut when you are ready. >>> > >>> > Thank you, >>> > Ahmet >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi guys, >>> > >>> > just to let you know that the build fully passed on my box. >>> > >>> > I'm testing the artifacts right now. >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > JB >>> > >>> > On 06/04/2018 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi guys, >>> > >>> > Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th. >>> > >>> > According to our cycle of release (roughly 6 weeks), we should >>> think >>> > about 2.5.0. >>> > >>> > I'm volunteer to tackle this release. >>> > >>> > I'm proposing the following items: >>> > >>> > 1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday >>> > 2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday night (Europe >>> time) >>> > 2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for this release. >>> Do you >>> > think we >>> > will be ready to try a release with Gradle ? >>> > >>> > After this release, I would like a discussion about: >>> > 1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven) >>> > 2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it would be >>> interesting >>> > to have >>> > different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs. That's >>> another >>> > discussion, I >>> > will start a thread about that. >>> > >>> > Thoughts ? >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > JB >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>
