+1 agree to wait two weeks. So I will tackle the release when back from vacation.
Thanks guys ! I can take off serene ;) Regards JB On 04/11/2018 11:20 PM, Ismaël Mejía wrote: > +1 to delay 2 weeks as Ahmet proposes. We can cut the branch in two > weeks in a more stable shape doing it right now is not a good idea. > We can justify the delay on the impact of transitioning the build system. > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 to delaying 2 weeks. >> >> I think it will be prudent to wait in this case. There is too much in flux >> with Gradle migration currently and based on Scott's latest update I think >> we will be in a more stable state in 2 weeks. Last Beam release date was >> 3/20 and our plan was to make a release every 6 weeks. Even if we start >> cutting a release in 2 weeks (~4/26), we will have more than a week to >> finish that release. Even if that is not enough time to finish a release it >> will put is in the proximity of the 5/5 target date. I prefer that option, >> to another potential release with Maven. >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Any hope the release is on central before the 30th? >> >> >> I do not think this was the plan to begin with. The time between the >> previous release and 4/30 is less than 6 weeks. >> >>> >>> >>> Le 11 avr. 2018 22:02, "Robert Bradshaw" <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>> +1 to keeping up the regular release cycle, but I don't think it makes >>>> sense to cut until we're ready to actively work on the release. A cut date >>>> two weeks from now seems fine (unless someone else is volunteering to do it >>>> this time around). >>>> >>>> That being said, a dry run using gradle now may make a lot of sense, >>>> giving us a couple of weeks to iron out the kinks, if any. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 PM Chamikara Jayalath >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi JB, >>>>> >>>>> Please note that I opened a blocker [1] (working on it) and looks like >>>>> we have several other JIRAs marked for 2.5.0. So +1 for waiting for two >>>>> weeks (or till JIRAs are resolved or moved off the list). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cham >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3991 >>>>> [2] >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.5.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> Due to the last work, I think it makes sense to try a release using >>>>>> Gradle. If it doesn't work smoothly, we will rollback to Maven, and >>>>>> maybe in that case, we should ask ourselves if Gradle is really a good >>>>>> alternative for now. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm in vacation tomorrow morning for 2 weeks. I can cut the release >>>>>> tomorrow end of the morning (my time). But in the case we need some >>>>>> additional PR merges or we have some work in progress, I'm proposing to >>>>>> postpone 2.5.0 release for the end of this month (in two weeks). If >>>>>> someone is volunteer to tackle this release, please, let us know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/04/2018 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> According to our cycle of release (roughly 6 weeks), we should think >>>>>>> about 2.5.0. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm volunteer to tackle this release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm proposing the following items: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday >>>>>>> 2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday night (Europe time) >>>>>>> 2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for this release. Do you >>>>>>> think we >>>>>>> will be ready to try a release with Gradle ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After this release, I would like a discussion about: >>>>>>> 1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven) >>>>>>> 2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it would be >>>>>>> interesting to have >>>>>>> different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs. That's another >>>>>>> discussion, I >>>>>>> will start a thread about that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >> >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
