What Josh said. Rat is mature and is aligned with ASF policy. I don’t recommend using it in the default build, as it gets false positives when there are junk files in your dev sandbox. But do enable it in CI and release builds.
Eyes is newer but looks like it has some nice features. Maybe enable it too? Julian > On Jul 18, 2023, at 06:06, Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io> wrote: > > I’ve only used rat, and it worked well for us. We used to check license > headers as part of the release process and it hasn’t failed us yet. I’ve not > used sky walking eyes. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 18, 2023, at 7:50 AM, Leo <leocser...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Currently we have in mind either Maven Rat (https://creadur.apache.org/rat/) >> or Apache Skywalking Eyes (https://github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes) as a >> license header tool. >> >> In your experience, which project would you suggest using and why? >> >> Best, >> Leonard >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org
