+1 as well for me. Regards JB
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:52 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote: > > +1 for me! Thanks! > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 6:43 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 5:14, Michael A. Smith <mich...@smith-li.com> wrote: > > > > > Please note I'm not proposing any changes to our CPython support in > > > this thread. This is just about pypy. > > > > > > The currently active versions of pypy only supports 3.9 and 3.10. I > > > propose we track whatever the latest pypy supports. > > > > > > Python 3.8 compatibility has been gone from pypy since 2023-06-16. > > > https://www.pypy.org/posts/2023/06/pypy-v7312-release.html > > > > > > Python 3.7 compatibility has been gone from pypy since 2022-12-06. > > > https://www.pypy.org/posts/2022/12/pypy-v7310-release.html > > > > > > This is mainly a response to AVRO-3952. Given that pypy3.9 and 3.10 > > > pass the check, it's probably a subtlety in how the github action > > > setup-python is setting up the obsolete pypy versions, and I suspect > > > it isn't worth putting in effort to fix. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Michael > > >
