Hi, Having both is an option, but I remember that we wanted to go directly to 1.12.0.
Regards JB On 2024/04/06 20:28:34 Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As I remember the discussion, we'd support both the last major release and > the current one. This would mean we should release both 1.11.4 and 1.12.0. > > Did I remember correctly? > > > Kind regards, > Oscar > > -- > Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <opw...@apache.org> > > Op vr 5 apr. 2024 17:20 schreef Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com>: > > > Hello everyone! I've been away for a bit, but I also think a new > > release would be welcome :D > > > > I'm willing to put in the work to do the packaging and deployment, > > especially if I can help another future "release manager" get > > everything in place to do the next one! > > > > Are we aligned on doing a 1.11.4 release or a 1.12.0 release? At one > > point we were pretty convinced that we would continue to maintain the > > 1.11.x branch so that we have two valid major releases[1]. > > > > I (errrr...) haven't built Avro recently on my local machine, which is > > currently required in order to do a release.[2] I can give that a > > try! > > > > All my best, Ryan > > > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d3wx977pk6gxjnjg4d1jk3583f2bfgx0 > > "[DISCUSS] Release maintenance and lifecycle" > > [2]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AVRO/How+To+Release > > "How to release" > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > <jbono...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Fokko ! > > > > > > Great. Let me check #3871 also. > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > On 2024/04/02 15:00:04 "Driesprong, Fokko" wrote: > > > > Sorry for the late reply JB. > > > > > > > > I'll do a review of #2642 <https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/2642>. > > I > > > > already tested this against Iceberg locally and didn't see any issues > > > > there. I would love to get in #3871 > > > > <https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/2732> as well. > > > > > > > > Cheers, Fokko > > > > > > > > Op di 2 apr 2024 om 16:57 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > jbono...@apache.org > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > As discussed on this thread, I would like to move forward on 1.12.0 > > > > > release. > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > I'm doing a pass on the issues. > > > > > > > > > > PS: I have a weird behavior with the mailing list, I might have to > > > > > re-subscribe. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > On 2024/03/14 08:53:05 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > > > Hey Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome ! > > > > > > > > > > > > Happy to help with 1.12.0 if needed :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2024/03/14 08:46:05 Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:16 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > j...@nanthrax.net> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently, we upgraded to commons-compress 1.26.0 (on main). > > > > > > > > commons-compress 1.26.0 fixes several CVEs (CVE-2024-25710, > > > > > > > > CVE-2024-26308, CVE-2023-42503). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be possible to release Avro 1.11.4 (that will include > > > > > > > > commons-compress update) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually a few weeks ago there was a proposal to release 1.12.0! > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8p8jkxx8f23yrss14q0y0ptdlttnxp4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can help on the release if there are no objections. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
