[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16702319#comment-16702319
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AVRO-2247:
--------------------------------------
unchuckable commented on issue #391: AVRO-2247 - improved java reading
performance with new reader
URL: https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/391#issuecomment-442576105
I agree that JMH will still be hard pressed for before/after comparisons,
unless the change can be toggled with a feature switch at runtime (which
fortunately is the case with the proposed change).
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Improve Java reading performance with a new reader
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-2247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2247
> Project: Apache Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Reporter: Martin Jubelgas
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
> Attachments: Perf-Comparison.md
>
>
> Complementary to AVRO-2090, I have been working on decoding of Avro objects
> in Java and am suggesting a new implementation of a DatumReader that improves
> read performance for both generic and specific records by approximately 20%
> (and even more in cases of nested objects with defaults, a case I encounter a
> lot in practical use).
> Key concept is to create a detailed execution plan once at DatumReader. This
> execution plan contains all required defaulting/lookup values so they need
> not be looked up during object traversal while reading.
> The reader implementation can be enabled and disabled per GenericData
> instance. The system default is set via the system variable
> "org.apache.avro.fastread" (defaults to "false").
> Attached a performance comparison of the existing implementation with the
> proposed one. Will open a pull request with respective code in a bit (not
> including interoperability with the optimizations of AVRO-2090 yet). Please
> let me know your opinion of whether this is worth pursuing further.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
