Hi all,

It has been about 1 week now.
Zoltan has put up a pull request correcting the copyright issue very
quickly last week.

Unfortunately I haven't seen any response from Thiruvalluvan M G <
th...@startsmartlabs.com> yet.
Since his changes were very simple (basic code cleanup) I propose we do the
following so we can cleanup the codebase and close the issues/pull requests
related to all of this.

1) I do a git revert on the two affected files and simply rollback his
changes. So "the changes made under the wrong license" are gone.
2) I merge the fix by Zoltan to correct the licenses.
3) I cleanup the code (now under the correct license).
4) I include the related things that have already been checked.

At this point I am unsure: Is this a valid way (from a licensing
perspective) to fix this?

Niels


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Suraj Acharya <su...@apache.org> wrote:

> As part of the release we do run the rat plugin.
> So it is a highly unlikely this would have been run through a release.
> However, changing it now is a great addition since the release manager has
> to go through the whole license check for all of the files.
> Also, as Sean mentioned anyone who has made any changes to the file after
> the addition of the license will also need to be informed of the change to
> the license.
>
> Thanks
>
> Suraj
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After we hear back from Thiru I would like Zoltan to fix these 4 files.
> >
> > lang/java/compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/
> > schema/SchemaVisitorAction.java
> > lang/java/compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/
> > schema/SchemaVisitor.java
> > lang/java/compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/
> > schema/Schemas.java
> > lang/java/compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/
> > schema/CloningVisitor.java
> >
> > See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2118
> >
> > After those have been fixed we can commit this change (guys, please
> review
> > this. Thanks.)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2119
> >
> > Niels Basjes
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I had a closer look at the code base.
> > >
> > > Most important:
> > > 1) I have found these files only in the master branch.
> > > 2) I checked both release 1.8.2 and 1.7.7 and in these files are NOT
> > > present in any of those releases. (
> > > So we're ok on this part.
> > >
> > > I have found exactly 2 files with this problem:
> > > ./lang/java/compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/
> > > schema/SchemaVisitorAction.java
> > > ./lang/java/compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/
> > > schema/SchemaVisitor.java
> > >
> > > I have found 1 additional commit that touches these two files:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/avro/commit/9132015450a2ad6f56cd582b393e8f
> > > 1b8df573c9
> > >
> > > commit 9132015450a2ad6f56cd582b393e8f1b8df573c9
> > >> Author:     Thiruvalluvan M G <th...@startsmartlabs.com>
> > >> AuthorDate: Sun Apr 30 21:02:02 2017 +0530
> > >> Commit:     Thiruvalluvan M G <th...@startsmartlabs.com>
> > >> CommitDate: Sun Apr 30 23:31:29 2017 +0530
> > >>     Added more tests and fixed a couple of bugs. Also formatted the
> code
> > >
> > >
> > > In both these files the only changes are:
> > > - Removing the author tag
> > > - Whitespace changes.
> > >
> > > See:
> > > https://github.com/apache/avro/commit/9132015450a2ad6f56cd582b393e8f
> > > 1b8df573c9#diff-d0adffb4097a1e43917fd5c3f2aae1ab
> > > https://github.com/apache/avro/commit/9132015450a2ad6f56cd582b393e8f
> > > 1b8df573c9#diff-ced3f0d25217ef63c2f2ea09a8b60e92
> > >
> > > @Thiru: To be 100% sure: You agree with changing these two files to the
> > > Apache license?
> > >
> > > Niels Basjes
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> In addition to Zoltan we'll need to confirm anyone else who has
> modified
> > >> the files.
> > >>
> > >> On Dec 13, 2017 11:46, "Sean Busbey" <bus...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Have these files made it into a release?
> > >> >
> > >> > On Dec 13, 2017 10:18, "Niels Basjes" <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Zoltan,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Because the copyright notice now says you own it I guess the best
> way
> > >> to
> > >> >> approach this is is when you put up a pull request with all those
> > files
> > >> >> files having a new license header.
> > >> >> That way it is clear that you made the license switch. I think this
> > >> should
> > >> >> be a separate jira to document this clearly.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> What do you guys think about this approach?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> @Nandor / Gabor: I'll put up a ticket that we should run rat much
> > more
> > >> >> often (for both 1.8 and master). (i.e. no longer only in separate
> > >> profile
> > >> >> of maven)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Niels Basjes
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Zoltan Farkas
> > >> >> <zolyfar...@yahoo.com.invalid
> > >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Hi Niels, the license is a mistake made by me.
> > >> >> > Those files were based from my work on spf4j-avro which is
> > currently
> > >> >> dual
> > >> >> > licensed with LGPL and Apache .
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > We should just replace the license headers with the appropriate
> > >> Apache
> > >> >> > header.
> > >> >> > Let me know if you need me to do anything.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thank you
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > --z
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > On Dec 13, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Hi all,
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > I was going through the codebase and I found that several files
> > are
> > >> >> not
> > >> >> > > Apache licensed.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/avro/tree/master/lang/java/
> > >> >> > compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/schema
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Some of these files do not have a copyright block (fixable),
> yet
> > >> some
> > >> >> > have
> > >> >> > > this:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > /*
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > * Copyright (c) 2001 - 2016, Zoltan Farkas All Rights Reserved.
> > >> >> > > *
> > >> >> > > * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > >> >> > > * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> > >> >> > > * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> > >> >> > > * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> > >> version.
> > >> >> > > *
> > >> >> > > * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be
> useful,
> > >> >> > > * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty
> of
> > >> >> > > * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > >> >> > > * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > >> >> > > *
> > >> >> > > * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General
> > Public
> > >> >> > > * License along with this program; if not, write to the Free
> > >> Software
> > >> >> > > * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
> > >> >> 02111-1307,
> > >> >> > USA.
> > >> >> > > */
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > And according to https://www.apache.org/legal/r
> > >> >> esolved.html#category-x
> > >> >> > the
> > >> >> > > LGPL is not allowed to be included.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > How do we fix this problem?
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > --
> > >> >> > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Niels Basjes
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Niels Basjes
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > >
> > > Niels Basjes
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> >
> > Niels Basjes
> >
>



-- 
Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,

Niels Basjes

Reply via email to