Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora at Mon Mar  9 18:01:55 2015:

Attendees: thalin, hsaputra, dnorris, wickman, jfarrell, jcohen, wfarner, kts, 
mkhutornenko, davmclau, zmanji, dlester

- Preface
- graduation
- Backwards incompatible change to job update API
- HTTP authentication
- 0.8.0


IRC log follows:

## Preface ##
[Mon Mar  9 18:02:57 2015] <wfarner>: welcome to the weekly community meeting, 
everyone!  as a reminder - if you're in this channel, you're welcome to 
participate!
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:04 2015] <wfarner>: let's start with the roll call
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:05 2015] <wfarner>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:08 2015] <mkhutornenko>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:09 2015] <kts>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:12 2015] <jcohen>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:12 2015] <jfarrell>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:12 2015] <dnorris>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:25 2015] <zmanji>: here
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:28 2015] <dlester>: present
[Mon Mar  9 18:03:59 2015] <thalin>: <--
[Mon Mar  9 18:04:05 2015] <hsaputra>: in
## graduation ##
[Mon Mar  9 18:04:45 2015] <jfarrell>: we are on the agenda for the march 18th 
agenda for vote on our resolution
[Mon Mar  9 18:04:54 2015] <dlester>: whoohoo!
[Mon Mar  9 18:05:09 2015] <hsaputra>: W00t
[Mon Mar  9 18:05:15 2015] <jfarrell>: the name search has been submitted as 
PODLINGNAMESEARCH-72 (thanks hsaputra)
[Mon Mar  9 18:05:26 2015] <hsaputra>: np
[Mon Mar  9 18:06:45 2015] <wfarner>: :-)
[Mon Mar  9 18:07:03 2015] <dlester>: Thanks, hsaputra!
[Mon Mar  9 18:07:20 2015] <jfarrell>: next topic?
## Backwards incompatible change to job update API ##
[Mon Mar  9 18:07:43 2015] <wfarner>: context: 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201502.mbox/%3CCAGRA8uP_CVYz%3Dof2-teEuke_eO%2BZBnXrLUjCdjB9tngDaDbeXA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[Mon Mar  9 18:08:21 2015] <wfarner>: i missed three API methods in my initial 
cut at this change, so another change has landed that breaks compatibility with 
the beta update API
[Mon Mar  9 18:08:35 2015] <wfarner>: my apologies for the additional churn, 
this should now be settled
[Mon Mar  9 18:09:06 2015] <hsaputra>: when REST API come later this changes 
should have less impact I suppose
[Mon Mar  9 18:09:50 2015] <davmclau>: I think it’s more to do with the 
feature being in BETA state than Thrift itself
[Mon Mar  9 18:09:52 2015] <jcohen>: hsaputra: we could still have backwards 
incompatible changes in the REST API.
[Mon Mar  9 18:10:02 2015] <jcohen>: the main issue here is, yeah, exactly, 
it’s beta
[Mon Mar  9 18:10:13 2015] <jcohen>: so we’re not concerned w/ doing a 
deprecation cycle
[Mon Mar  9 18:10:25 2015] <wfarner>: hsaputra davmclau you're both correct.  
we will have a more formal versioning strategy, but we're also playing more 
loosely with this API given the beta tag
[Mon Mar  9 18:10:55 2015] <hsaputra>: Hopefully less impact since REST layer 
will have more ways to adjust to signature via URL and intermediate massaging 
of params
[Mon Mar  9 18:11:06 2015] <hsaputra>: but +1 for Beta tag
## HTTP authentication ##
[Mon Mar  9 18:11:38 2015] <wfarner>: kts: can you give an update?
[Mon Mar  9 18:11:58 2015] <kts>: first patch adding support for HTTP basic 
auth and a reflectively-generated permission syntax is up
[Mon Mar  9 18:12:01 2015] <kts>: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31820/
[Mon Mar  9 18:12:57 2015] <kts>: with this patch it's possible to (for 
example) add a backup service user that can only call listBackups
[Mon Mar  9 18:13:06 2015] <kts>: or lock down admin functionality
[Mon Mar  9 18:13:45 2015] <kts>: hoping to get some feedback on it soon. all: 
please feel free to review
[Mon Mar  9 18:13:59 2015] <wfarner>: higher-level context on this feature:
[Mon Mar  9 18:14:00 2015] <wfarner>: AURORA-720
[Mon Mar  9 18:15:16 2015] <wfarner>: that's all the topics i had for today, 
does anyone else have a topic they'd like to raise?
[Mon Mar  9 18:15:18 2015] <kts>: this patch is the authenticated, authorized 
portion of that. for secured you'll still need to front with an https reverse 
proxy for now
## 0.8.0 ##
[Mon Mar  9 18:15:39 2015] <jfarrell>: AURORA-904
[Mon Mar  9 18:16:22 2015] <jfarrell>: i'm a little concerned about adding in 
pesos to the 0.8.0 with all the other api/auth changes occurring
[Mon Mar  9 18:17:14 2015] <jfarrell>: thoughts on pushing AURORA-1031 to 0.9.0 
and giving it more time to get in and get tested
[Mon Mar  9 18:17:59 2015] <wfarner>: +1
[Mon Mar  9 18:18:15 2015] <kts>: +1
[Mon Mar  9 18:18:43 2015] <wfarner>: downside is that it makes for a 
feature-light release.  but i'll take that over a late/unstable release
[Mon Mar  9 18:19:05 2015] <jfarrell>: out of the issues in 0.8.0 that was the 
only one i've been concerned about making it in and not having enough time to 
have it soak in tests
[Mon Mar  9 18:19:31 2015] <wfarner>: i have removed this ticket from the RC 
blockers
[Mon Mar  9 18:20:16 2015] <wfarner>: anything else on 0.8.0, jfarrell?
[Mon Mar  9 18:20:25 2015] <wickman>: the dual reading will need to be in 0.8.0
[Mon Mar  9 18:20:39 2015] <jfarrell>: we will probably want to have a release 
right after graduation and look at removing all the extra -incubating, etc.
[Mon Mar  9 18:21:06 2015] <wfarner>: wickman: is that not on master?  
according to the ticket, it is resolved
[Mon Mar  9 18:21:19 2015] <wickman>: if we dual reading thermos observer / 
thermos cli out for 0.8.0 and people get it deployed, then we can switch to 
sandbox checkpointing in 0.9.0
[Mon Mar  9 18:21:30 2015] <wickman>: wfarner: just one last review that needs 
to be merged to master.  i have ships on it, just need to run e2e
[Mon Mar  9 18:21:53 2015] <wfarner>: wickman: can you make sure the 
appropriate ticket(s) are marked as blockers of AURORA-904?
[Mon Mar  9 18:22:10 2015] <wickman>: yeah, i think i may have prematurely 
resolved AURORA-1027
[Mon Mar  9 18:22:12 2015] <wfarner>: according to the current blockers, we're 
good to go w.r.t. checkpoint reading
[Mon Mar  9 18:22:17 2015] <wfarner>: aha
[Mon Mar  9 18:22:24 2015] <wickman>: or 1026, i forget which
[Mon Mar  9 18:23:04 2015] <wfarner>: any other topics before i close the 
meeting?
[Mon Mar  9 18:23:31 2015] <jfarrell>: think we are good
[Mon Mar  9 18:23:34 2015] <wfarner>: thanks, folks!
[Mon Mar  9 18:23:36 2015] <wfarner>: ASFBot: meeting stop


Meeting ended at Mon Mar  9 18:23:36 2015

Reply via email to