We would be interested in the Shiro authentication track as well. As I understand it, is a prerequisite for a more refined security model (including the observer deprecation) where we can hinder users from looking into each others sandboxes.
Regards, Stephan ________________________________________ From: Joshua Cohen <jco...@twopensource.com> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:47 PM To: dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org; jfarr...@apache.org Subject: Re: Soliciting feature requests for 0.8.0 Big +1 for getting Shiro in, as it will require a deprecation cycle before we can remove the old auth system, and the less time we have both hanging around the better. I'd love to see better packaging/distribution as well (AURORA-951). On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote: > Would love to see AURORA-951: debian packaging make it into 0.8.0. > > AURORA-1031: pesos seems like it might be a big change and might be worth > waiting till 0.9.0 so it can get more eyes on it and some time to soak in > tests > > -Jake > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I'd like to get the ball rolling on 0.8.0 by seeking input from the > > community about what you all would like to see in the next release. Bear > > in mind that we are aiming to release about once per month, so that > > duration should help guide the number and complexity of features we > target. > > > > We seeded this discussion in this week's IRC meeting, and had a few early > > suggestions: > > > > AURORA-809: authentication with shiro > > > > AURORA-1024: dual read thermos checkpoint data (a step towards retiring > the > > thermos observer) > > > > (no ticket): lift server-side job update coordination to default, > deprecate > > client-orchestrated updates > > > > AURORA-1031: replace libmesos in the executor with pesos, simplifying the > > python build significantly > > > > > > Jake Farrell has volunteered to act as Release Manager for 0.8.0 (thanks, > > Jake!), but if any other PPMC member would like to cut their teeth at > this, > > he will happily be relieved of the duty :-) > > > > So with that, please feel free to +/-1, +0 individual features listed > > above, or suggest additional features we should target! > > > > > > -=Bill > > >
