Docker support would be *awesome*. I'll be happy to assist with getting that patch in!
Mid Q1 is a very pessimistic measure, partially with the context that peoples' time is spotty in December. I would have no problem cutting 0.7.0 much earlier as long as we wrap up the deprecations. -=Bill On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Dave Lester <d...@davelester.org> wrote: > > For some reason I can see Dobromir's message in the markmail archive ([ > http://markmail.org/message/6v54d3lc5qwerzq5 ]( > http://markmail.org/message/6v54d3lc5qwerzq5 )), but never received the > message to my personal email account. He wrote: > > "We have someone working on integrating Docker support into Aurora; it > seems fairly minor and would be neat to get into the 0.7.0 release..." > > IMHO, Docker support in Aurora would be a large driver for adoption. > Should there be a good patch, it'd be nice to get a release sooner than > mid-Q1 which seems a ways off. Maybe we can up the release cadence a bit > more to make this possible. > > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Bill Farner" <wfar...@apache.org> > Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:13pm > To: "dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org" <dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Features for 0.7.0 > > > > If you think AURORA-915 can be completed by the end of January, i don't see > any reason to keep it out. > > -=Bill > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Brian Wickman <wick...@apache.org> wrote: > > > In the deprecated behavior category, I'd like to get feedback on > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-915 as possible candidate > for > > inclusion to 0.7.0 (at the very least, warn-on-import and providing a > > binding helper for os.environ.) > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > It is not yet tracked in our end - we have yet to think about what > mesos' > > > presistent resources look like under Aurora. Given the timeframe we're > > > shooting for with 0.7.0, it's unlikely MESOS-1554 will be committed and > > > released by the time we cut 0.7.0. > > > > > > -=Bill > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly> > wrote: > > > > > > > It might be minor, already tracked or maybe nothing todo but support > > for > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1554 would be awesome > :) ( > > > > once > > > > released ) without forcing dedicated service. > > > > > > > > /******************************************* > > > > Joe Stein > > > > Founder, Principal Consultant > > > > Big Data Open Source Security LLC > > > > http://www.stealth.ly > > > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop > > > > ********************************************/ > > > > On Dec 1, 2014 4:17 PM, "Bill Farner" <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Now that 0.6.0 is buttoned up, it's time to think about what we > would > > > > like > > > > > to shoot for in 0.7.0 [1]! > > > > > > > > > > Framing the discussion - i'd like to suggest we keep 0.7.0 a > 'minor' > > > > > release to allow us to wrap it up by mid Q1. So while lofty goals > > are > > > > more > > > > > than welcome in JIRA, let's be somewhat resistant to them in the > > > upcoming > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > To summarize what's currently on the docket, we have: > > > > > - removal of several minor deprecated behaviors [2] > > > > > - begin phasing out the 'v1' client > > > > > - promote server-side updates, phase out client-side job update > > > behavior > > > > > > > > > > With that in mind, what else would you all (non-committers welcome) > > > like > > > > to > > > > > see in 0.7.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-872 > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-423 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
