Agreed. That would be a logical generalization of the post failover behavior.
I have updated the above document with the following changes: - Reply with PAUSED any time a job was paused by user; - Start in paused state by default. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Kevin Sweeney <kevi...@apache.org> wrote: > The doc mentioned that the scheduler will start an update subject to the > heartbeat countdown, and if it doesn't receive a heartbeat it will pause > the update. Why not start with the update paused-due-to-no-heartbeat to > fail-fast any connectivity issues between the service providing the > heartbeats and the scheduler? > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We are proposing a new feature for the scheduler updater, which you >> may find helpful. >> >> I have posed a brief feature summary here: >> >> https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/hb_doc/docs/update-heartbeat.md >> >> Please, reply with your feedback/concerns/comments. >> >> Thanks, >> Maxim >>
