Sorry - the review is in https://reviews.apache.org/r/17457/.
-mark On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > Can you link to the review? I can pull down the patch and try it out. > > -=Bill > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll <mchucarr...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > I've been working on getting together an and-to-end test for open-source > > Aurora. In order to get it working with a realistic scenario including > > multiple task instances, I've modified the vagrant configuration to > launch > > to mesos slaves, each of which believes that it has 4cpus to allocate. > I'd > > like to make this two-slave setup the default vagrant configuration. > > > > On my work laptop (Macbook Pro, 4 cores, 8GB memory), it's > > indistinguishable from running with just one slave - there's no visible > > impact on the performance of other tasks, and running little benchmarks > on > > my laptop show no statistically meaningful variation between the 1 and 2 > > slave configs when no tasks are running on the slaves. I suspect that > with > > less memory, there would be more performance impact, but I can't measure > > that. > > > > Does anyone object to this change? (If so, I'll put this as a new > > Vagrantfile in the directory containing the end-to-end tests. But I'd > > really prefer to have a single canonical vagrant test/demonstration > > configuration.) > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Mark > > >
