Sounds good. I think we're relatively converged, so let me propose a vote.
On Oct 31, 2024 at 16:02:45, Murtadha Al-Hubail <hubail...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to having two threads for APEs being an overkill. > > I propose that we send an explicit APE acceptance on the discussion thread > when one of the acceptance criteria is met rather than the APE being > accepted by default. This should give a clear indication to the discussion > participants and also gives them a chance to highlight any open questions > that should still be discussed. > > - Murtadha > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:18 AM Hussain Towaileb <htowai...@apache.org> > wrote: > > +1 > > > I think best to phrase is for threads that have no on-going discussions, > > and all trailing replies are either looks good to me or +1s. > > > On 2024/10/30 19:30:49 Mike Carey wrote: > > > +1 for this change. (We may just want to be sure we only do this for > > > things where there isn't ongoing discussion like UPDATE, where we're > > > still finalizing the exact syntax based on input from the dev > > > community? I'm not sure how to phrase that - e.g., "if the discussion > > > is clearly positive and there aren't open issues"? I would characterize > > > UPDATE's discussion as positive but still converging on the final > > details.) > > > > > > On 10/30/24 10:23 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > There has been a great influx of APEs lately, and that is wonderful to > > see. > > > > I also think many of them are not very controversial; the discussion > > thread > > > > is pretty much just +1 or agreement on the feature being a great > > addition. > > > > > > > > When the PMC voted on adopting the APE process in 2023, the process we > > > > agreed on was having a [DISCUSS] thread and then a [VOTE] thread. I > > think > > > > this is overkill in the case where the change is clearly a shoo-in. I > > > > therefore propose the process be amended such that: > > > > - IF the discussion is clearly positive after 72 hours, AND > > > > -the change is not breaking or deprecating existing functionality, AND > > > > -3 or more PMC members have expressed positive sentiment at the change > > > > > > > > the APE is by default accepted. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Ian > > > > > > >
