+1

> On Oct 25, 2024, at 04:04, Wail Alkowaileet <wael....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> *Regards,*
> Wail Alkowaileet
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 13:30 Murtadha Al-Hubail <hubail...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1, it's past time that we get rid of those enforced types.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 8:25 PM Ian Maxon <ima...@uci.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1, This is really awesome. The change required is remarkably small.
>>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2024 at 21:51:12, Shahrzad Haji Amin Shirazi <
>>> shahrzad.hajiaminshir...@email.ucr.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Initiating the discussion thread to propose the creation of the
>>>> Heterogeneous Index in AsterixDB.
>>>> *Feature:* Heterogeneous Index
>>>> 
>>>> *Details:*In the current version of AsterixDB, creating a
>>>> 
>>>> secondary index on a field requires that the field's type
>>>> 
>>>> be either defined within the data type or explicitly specified in
>>>> 
>>>> the index DDL. We are planning to introduce the Heterogeneous
>>>> 
>>>> Index in AsterixDB, which will allow you to create an index on a
>>>> 
>>>> field without the need to define its type. This means the field’s
>>>> 
>>>> type will no longer need to be specified in either the data type
>>>> 
>>>> or the index creation DDL.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> *Changeset*: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/18522
>>>> 
>>>> *APE*:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ASTERIXDB/APE*10*3A*Heterogeneous*Indexes__;KyUrKw!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!K5o-GP2B5s_kN_KAqEoroySnvC0zLDE34kGijH2QxCL0v3qRWdX8HXv03MLGffbTbjc7MBl5tvW4P5SoI6d-r0iCIMgif90$
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to