Thanks!!!

In <cad1rbrq0zwbh2ob-s4dd6m24dojybi4yn99+7w69_+11wxw...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: [RESULT][VOTE][Swift] Split Swift to separated repository" on Fri, 23 
May 2025 09:57:38 +0200,
  Raúl Cumplido <rau...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Kou,
> 
> I've created the apache/arrow-swift repository [1].
> 
> Regards,
> Raúl
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-swift
> 
> El vie, 23 may 2025 a las 8:27, Sutou Kouhei (<k...@clear-code.com>)
> escribió:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote carries with:
>>
>> 8 +1 (binding):
>> - Sutou Kouhei
>> - Bryce Mecum
>> - Neal Richardson
>> - Raúl Cumplido
>> - Wes McKinney
>> - Krisztián Szűcs
>> - Jacob Wujciak
>> - Matt Topol
>>
>> 1 +1 (non-binding):
>> - Ruoxi Sun
>>
>>
>> Raúl, could you create apache/arrow-swift?
>> We can use https://gitbox.apache.org/boxer/ for it.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> kou
>>
>> In <20250520.102433.1649746168986082120....@clear-code.com>
>>   "[VOTE][Swift] Split Swift to separated repository" on Tue, 20 May 2025
>> 10:24:33 +0900 (JST),
>>   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to propose splitting the Swift implementation
>> > to its own repository.
>> >
>> > Motivation:
>> >
>> > * We want to make the Swift implementation Swift Package
>> >   Manager compatible.
>> >   * It requires a top-level Package.swift.
>> >     See also: https://www.swift.org/documentation/package-manager/
>> >
>> > Approach:
>> >
>> > 1. Extract swift/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-swift like
>> >    we did for apache/arrow-go.
>> >    * Filter swift/ related commits from apache/arrow and
>> >      create apache/arrow-swift with them like we did for
>> >      apache/arrow-go.
>> >    * Remove swift/ related codes from apache/arrow.
>> > 2. Prepare CI.
>> > 3. Prepare release scripts based on apache/arrow-go and
>> >    apache/arrow-java.
>> >
>> > See also the discussion of this:
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dp8ovo34o3vs0tc3w0rnh8ttkqtonkzc
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --
>> > kou
>>

Reply via email to