It seems that there is a consensus to release 18.3.0. I'll follow up with
it.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:12 AM Jacob Wujciak-Jens <ja...@wujciak.de>
wrote:

> Yep in that case it's 18.3 :) thanks for checking!
>
> Raúl Cumplido <rau...@apache.org> schrieb am So., 20. Apr. 2025, 17:11:
>
> > I don't think 18.2.1 vs 18.3.0 is too relevant but I took a look on the
> > commits and there are some minor features like:
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/697
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/660
> >
> > 18.3.0 sounds good to me.
> >
> > El dom, 20 abr 2025 a las 10:19, Jacob Wujciak-Jens (<ja...@wujciak.de>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Following SemVer if it's only fixes and dependencies it should be a
> patch
> > > version bump so 18.2.1
> > >
> > > Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 20. Apr. 2025, 10:04:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > If this is not in a hurry, I'd like to be the release manager to go
> > > through
> > > > the release process.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 2:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As the release will include only dependency updates and fixes (no
> new
> > > > > feature for now), 18.3 makes more sense to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > Le dim. 20 avr. 2025 à 08:09, David Li <lidav...@apache.org> a
> > écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should we call it 18.3 or 19.0? If we’re not tied to the C++
> > release
> > > > > > process anymore I’d like to follow semver if possible
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025, at 14:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I propose to submit a new Arrow Java release to vote.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As discussed previously, I would like to propose a regular
> > release
> > > > > > > pace for Arrow Java.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > JB
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to