Looks good to me Matt.

Rusty

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 19:02 Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Following on from the previous discussion [1] and on the google doc
> [2], I've put up a PR to formally update the documentation in the
> Flight.proto file and the Flight.rst in the Arrow Docs [3].
>
> Before I start a vote to add this to the Arrow Flight spec formally, I
> thought it might be good to have one last discussion thread for anyone
> to voice any concerns, objections, or otherwise take a look and chime
> in.
>
> For reference, none of the Arrow Flight implementations (to my
> knowledge) actually implement handling of the URIs beyond possibly
> parsing it. The handling of the logic for re-using the flight client
> or creating a new one, or otherwise is always left to the consumer. As
> such, there's no implementations that need to be created in order to
> bring it to a vote as far as I can tell.
>
> Thanks all!
>
> --Matt
>
> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/qmgfzy8ofrdk6bv1rknnnj2ls5cqytzq
> [2]:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-x7tHWDzpbgmsjtTUnVXeEO4b7vMWDHTu-lzxlK9_hE/edit?tab=t.0
> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46194
>

Reply via email to