Thanks James, Fokko! Sounds like we are generally in agreement to move
forward.

I'll leave the discussion open for now in case others have
questions/comments to add.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:25 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey Dane,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up again.
>
> In the dev-list thread you referred to I hesitated to drop Java <17, but it
> is time. We see several projects that are moving past Java 8, and in
> the process are also dropping Java 11 since it is not supported anymore
> <https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/java-se-support-roadmap.html>. I
> echo'd this on the Iceberg dev list, and also suggested this with Avro 1.12
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/6vbd3w5qk7mpb5lyrfyf2s0z1cymjt5w>.
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
>
>
> Op do 25 apr 2024 om 22:02 schreef Dane Pitkin
> <d...@voltrondata.com.invalid
> >:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to revisit the discussion of dropping Java 8 (and maybe 11)
> > from Arrow's Java implementation. See GH issue[1] below. This was also
> > discussed in the last Arrow community sync meeting on 2024-04-24.
> >
> > For context, this was discussed[2] last year on this mailing list. We
> > decided to revisit the discussion around the June 2024 release (Arrow
> v17).
> > The timing coincides with the initial release of Apache Spark 4.0.0,
> which
> > drops both Java 8 and 11 support.
> >
> > For background, we chose not to drop Java 8 support last year because
> Arrow
> > is seen as a low level library that should support as many environments
> as
> > possible. Nowadays, we see more enthusiasm for dropping Java 8 (and 11)
> as
> > exemplified by Apache Spark as well as Apache Iceberg[3].
> >
> > Is it time to consider dropping Java 8? Should we drop Java 11 and skip
> > straight to Java 17 as our minimum version? What implications do we need
> to
> > be aware of?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dane
> >
> > [1]https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/38051
> > [2]https://lists.apache.org/thread/s07jx58yw4mkl54t3bkggnyg0sftcrr8
> > [3]https://lists.apache.org/thread/ntrk2thvsg9tdccwd4flsdz9gg743368
> >
>

Reply via email to