+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the work on this Adam and Andrew!
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: David Li <lidav...@apache.org> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 8:40:10 AM To: dev@arrow.apache.org <dev@arrow.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Stateless prepared statements in FlightSQL +1 Thank you Adam! On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, at 10:07, Andrew Lamb wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I reviewed the spec proposal and the rust implementation and I think they > look good to go. I am not as confident on the golang implementation, but > the comments on the Go PR look like there are no objections. > > Thank you for your work driving this forward > > Andrew > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:04 PM Adam C <adam.curtis....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to propose a change to the FlightSQL specification as >> originally described in this Github issue [1] by Andrew Lamb. The >> specification change would allow servers to support prepared >> statements with parameters, without needing to manage state between >> client requests. >> >> There is a draft pull request [2] submitted by me that updates the >> protobuf format and documents the changes made in the FlightSQL >> specification. I have also created draft reference implementations for >> the Go [3] and Rust [4] FlightSQL libraries. These implementations >> will be submitted as pull requests once the proposal is officially >> adopted. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... >> >> Cheers, >> Adam Curtis >> >> [1]: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37720 >> [2]: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40243 >> [3]: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40311 >> [4]: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5433 >>
