Also, with ADBC driver implementations currently in flux (none of them
has reached the "stable" status in
https://arrow.apache.org/adbc/main/driver/status.html), it might be a
disservice to users to implicitly fetch drivers from potentially
outdated DLLs on the current system.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 20/03/2024 à 15:08, Matt Topol a écrit :
it seems like the current driver manager work has been largely targeting
an app-specific implementation.
Yup, that was the intention. So far discussions of ADBC having a
system-wide driver registration paradigm like ODBC have mostly been to
discuss how much we dislike that paradigm and would prefer ADBC to stay
with the app-specific approach that we currently have. :)
As of yet, no one has requested such a paradigm so the discussions haven't
gotten revived.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:22 AM David Coe <david....@microsoft.com.invalid>
wrote:
ODBC has different OS-level driver managers available on their respective
systems. It seems like the current driver manager<
https://arrow.apache.org/adbc/main/cpp/driver_manager.html> work has been
largely targeting an app-specific implementation. Have there been any
discussions of ADBC having a similar system-wide driver registration
paradigm like ODBC does?
