Hello Everyone, We have 6 +1 votes and no -1 votes, so the vote passes.
Thanks everyone for participating in this and preventing breakage on the ecosystem that wouldn't have issues with the previous format proposal. -- Felipe On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 10:15 AM Jonathan Keane <jke...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > -Jon > > > On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 3:54 AM Joris Van den Bossche < > jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 10:44, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > But I also reiterate my plea that these existing parsers get fixed so > as > > > to entirely validate the format string instead of stopping early. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > Le 06/10/2023 à 23:26, Felipe Oliveira Carvalho a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I'm writing to propose "+vl" and "+vL" as format strings for > list-view > > and > > > > large list-view arrays passing through the Arrow C data interface > [1]. > > > > > > > > The previous proposal was considered a bad idea because existing > > parsers of > > > > these format strings might be looking at only the first `l` (or `L`) > > after > > > > the `+` and assuming the classic list format from that alone, so now > > I'm > > > > proposing we start with a `+v` as this prefix is not shared with any > > other > > > > existing type so far. > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 - I'm in favor of this new C Data Format string > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 - I'm against adding this new format string because.... > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Felipe > > > > > > > > [1] https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CDataInterface.html > > > > > > >
