I'm sorry for missing earlier discussion on this or a PR into the format where this discussion may have occurred...is there a reason that +lv and +Lv were chosen over a single-character version (i.e., maybe +v and +V)? A single-character version is (slightly) easier to parse in C.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:00 PM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm writing to propose "+lv" and "+Lv" as format strings for list-view and > large list-view arrays passing through the Arrow C data interface [1]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 - I'm in favor of this new C Data Format string > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 - I'm against adding this new format string because.... > > Thanks everyone! > > -- > Felipe > > [1] https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CDataInterface.html
