Hello,

Some time ago we added a `.github/CODEOWNERS` file in the main Arrow repo. The idea is that, when specific files or directories are touched by a PR, specific people are asked for review.

Unfortunately, it seems that, most of the time, this produces the following effects:

1) the people who are automatically queried for review don't show up (perhaps they simply ignore those automatic notifications) 2) when several people are assigned for review, each designated reviewer seems to hope that the other ones will be doing the work, instead of doing it themselves 3) contributors expect those people to show up and are therefore bewildered when nobody comes to review their PR

Do we want to keep CODEOWNERS? If we still think it can be beneficial, we should institute a policy where people who are listed in that file promise to respond to review requests: 1) either by doing a review 2) or by de-assigning themselves, and if possible pinging another core developer.

What do you think?

Regards

Antoine.

Reply via email to