Sure! In <cad1rbron2rkpj+jbi764qw7j7q9rpxfxpyhve8qo8aknwem...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [DISCUSS] Interest in a 12.0.1 patch?" on Fri, 19 May 2023 11:01:52 +0200, Raúl Cumplido <raulcumpl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Based on some conversations, I am +1 on creating the 12.0.1 release. I > can work as release manager for the release, I'll need a PMC to sign > and upload packages as usual. Kou, will you be able to help me with > that? > > Thanks, > Raúl > > El jue, 18 may 2023 a las 19:52, Will Jones > (<will.jones...@gmail.com>) escribió: >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Weston. >> >> Joris has already created a 12.0.1 milestone that contains several fixes >> that are candidates for backport [1], including this one. I think this is >> the most severe issue though. >> >> As a maintainer of the Python deltalake package, which uses the PyArrow >> Parquet writer and is often passed pandas data, I would appreciate a patch >> release. >> >> Best, >> >> Will Jones >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A12.0.1 >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ian Cook <i...@ursacomputing.com> wrote: >> >> > There is also a major issue with the 12.0.0 R package that has now >> > been fixed in the repo [2] and needs to be resubmitted to CRAN soon. >> > The R package developers are supportive of a 12.0.1 patch release >> > happening soon so that the resubmission of the R package to CRAN can >> > also include the fix for the performance regression you mention. >> > >> > Ian >> > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35612 >> > >> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:04 PM Weston Pace <weston.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Regrettabl, 12.0.0 had a significant performance regression (I'll take >> > the >> > > blame for not thinking through all the use cases), most easily exposed >> > when >> > > writing datasets from pandas / numpy data, which is being addressed in >> > > [1]. I believe this to be a fairly common use case and it may warrant a >> > > 12.0.1 patch. Are there other issues that would need a patch? Do we >> > feel >> > > this issue is significant enough to justify the work? >> > > >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35565 >> >
