Hi all, Just a reminder that this vote is still outstanding - if anyone (PMC or not) is interested in taking a look. Thanks!
-David On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 05:40, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Hello, > > I would urge people to review the proposed ADBC APIs, especially the Go > and Java APIs which probably benefitted from less feedback than the C one. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 21/09/2022 à 17:40, David Li a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> We have been discussing [1] standard interfaces for Arrow-based database >> access and have been working on implementations of the proposed interfaces >> [2], all under the name "ADBC". This proposal aims to provide a unified >> client abstraction across Arrow-native database protocols (like Flight SQL) >> and non-Arrow database protocols, which can then be used by Arrow projects >> like Dataset/Acero and ecosystem projects like Ibis. >> >> For details, see the RFC here: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14079 >> >> I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with >> apache/arrow-adbc commit 7866a56 [3], as version 1.0.0 of the ADBC API >> standard. >> >> Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. (This is not a >> vote to release any components.) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC specification >> [ ] 0 >> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... >> >> Thanks to the DuckDB and R DBI projects for providing feedback on and >> implementations of the proposal. >> >> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cq7t9s5p7dw4vschylhwsfgqwkr5fmf2 >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc >> [3]: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/commit/7866a566f5b7b635267bfb7a87ea49b01dfe89fa >> >> Thank you, >> David
