+1 to the idea on making it a stable interface

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 6:57 PM Jonathan Keane <jke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I too am +1 (nonbinding) to marking it as stable
>
> -Jon
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 1:05 PM Neal Richardson <
> neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me too to mark it as stable. De facto it is stable: there have
> been
> > no modifications to
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/c/abi.h since
> > the
> > stream was added in 2020.
> >
> > Neal
> >
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:32 PM Dewey Dunnington <de...@voltrondata.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm fairly new to this but have worked on the DuckDB--R bindings
> > > integration and used it in geospatial prototyping for a few things. I
> > would
> > > love to see the ArrowArrayStream declared as stable to promote its
> > adoption
> > > (or start the process of finalizing its definition if there is pending
> > > feedback that hasn't yet been incorporated).
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:59 PM Will Jones <will.jones...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Arrow C Stream Interface is still listed as experimental [1],
> > though
> > > it
> > > > was introduced about 20 months ago [2]. It's being used in the
> > > > well-advertised integration between PyArrow/R arrow and DuckDB [3].
> > > Support
> > > > was added to both Rust implementations [4][5]. It was discussed in
> > > today's
> > > > sync meeting that additional systems have been experimenting with it
> > [6].
> > > >
> > > > Should we stabilize the API now? Or are there any changes we need to
> > > > contemplate based on the experience of our early adopters?
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://arrow.apache.org/docs/7.0/format/CStreamInterface.html
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8052
> > > > [3] https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2021/12/03/arrow-duckdb/
> > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/1384
> > > > [5] https://github.com/jorgecarleitao/arrow2/pull/857
> > > > [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/x03nck8rpmyd8td6vpz1ctqgno1cbf10
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to