In general I am +1 on this.

However, I believe there is a team who has been actively working on many 
Ballista enhancements and I don't think that I have seen feedback from them on 
this yet (I apologize if I missed it).  I would be interested in getting their 
view - in particular on making sure ballista keeps up with datafusion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 9:55 AM
To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] [Rust] Move Ballista to new arrow-ballista repository

I would like to propose that we move the Ballista project to a new top-level 
*arrow-ballista* repository.

The rationale for this (copied from the GitHub issue [1]) is:

   -

   Decouple release process for DataFusion and Ballista
   -

   Allow each project to have top-level documentation and user guides that
   are targeting the appropriate audience
   -

   Reduce issue tracking and PR review burden for DataFusion maintainers
   who are not as interested in Ballista
   -

   Help avoid accidental circular dependencies being introduced between the
   projects (such as [3])
   -

   Helps formalize the public API for DataFusion that other query engines
   should be using

There is a design docment [3] that outlines the plan for implementing this.

Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community are 
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". The vote will run 
for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Proceed with moving Ballista to a new arrow-ballista repository [ ]
+0

[ ] -1 Do not proceed with moving Ballista to a new arrow-ballista repository 
because ...

Here is my vote:

+1 (binding)

[1] 
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Farrow-datafusion%2Fissues%2F2502&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C6d6114e6344942d5890308da3743b571%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637883061195430782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=46cU4UZ85eXCnbP6krI9DEWjI74%2FHqMphcHbNbTP%2F%2Fc%3D&amp;reserved=0

[2] 
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Farrow-datafusion%2Fissues%2F2433&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C6d6114e6344942d5890308da3743b571%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637883061195430782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=p7W55b5VhezFRi3ETQFJ3pntTIttMPX8C0D8aMLLcSw%3D&amp;reserved=0

[3]
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1jNRbadyStSrV5kifwn0khufAwq6OnzGczG4z8oTQJP4%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C6d6114e6344942d5890308da3743b571%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637883061195430782%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=tNRaj0SwE60RLEMqhe3auQnw0dBTBA13EhUwBM5XFEg%3D&amp;reserved=0

Reply via email to