While we do track benchmarks for each commit on Conbench [1] it seems we lack benchmarks for the temporal operations. I filed ARROW-16173 [2].
They do do a bit more work than just a round (especially if they need to handle time zones). [1]: https://conbench.ursa.dev/ [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16173 -David On Tue, Apr 12, 2022, at 15:40, Li Jin wrote: > Sorry I should have mentioned this is the Arrow C++ compute kernels. > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 3:39 PM Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> We recently noticed unexpected performance with Arrow's temporal >> operation kernels (in particular, CeilTemporal). The perf we see are around >> 1.4-1.8 Gb / s. This seems to be much lower than adding a constant to a >> float column (~9Gb/s). This is a bit unexpected because CeilTemporal is >> similar to a numeric round operation so we are wondering if there are some >> benchmarks around this and where the issue might be? >> >> Thanks! >> Li >>
