Hi Andrew, Happy new year. I'm not familiar with Rust but it seems like a lot of the intention here is to really treat Arrow-RS as a pre-1.0 package (we should maybe be doing the same for other libraries as well but that is a separate issue). Is it possible to deprecate the existing arrow-rs and create a new 'arrow-rs2' package and keep it at a pre-1.0 until the community feels that it has reached 1.0.
I'm sure this will cause some pain and confusion but it might be better in the long run? -Micah On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 4:55 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote: > Happy New Year, > > I would like to discuss more frequent major arrow-rs releases and have > written my thoughts on a ticket [1] and would love any additional community > feedback. Among other things this would result in versions that no longer > align with the C/C++ implementation. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120 >
