On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:53 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > It's useful! > > We have two options to use this: > > 1. Use this on https://github.com/apache/arrow > 2. Use this on https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/ > > 1. is for CI of each commit/pull request. > > 2. is for CI of daily build and "@github-actions crossbow > submit ..." comment in pull request. > > (We can choose both of them.) > > If we choose 1., we need to ask INFRA for adding new > self-hosted runners. Because we don't have admin permission > of apache/arrow. Could you show a URL how to use the > self-hosted runners? > > If we choose 2., we will able to do all needed work by > ourselves because we have admin permission of > ursacomputing/crossbow/. We already have a self-hosted runner configured for crossbow where we build the Apple M1 wheels.
I think we should start to configure the new runners for crossbow and work out the details, and then later (if we choose to) get the required registration tokens from INFRA. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <2a0074c7-562c-3a41-8763-6e1d4ac17...@arm.com> > "Arm64 github runner" on Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:43:16 +0800, > Yibo Cai <yibo....@arm.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We have free Arm64 instances (maintained by Arm) as github action > > self-hosted runners for open source projects. > > Arrow Arm CI is currently running on Travis. Is an additional Arm64 > > runner useful? I think we can build and verify Arm64 Linux releases on > > it. > > > > Yibo
