+1 On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:37 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 7:46 AM Keith Kraus <keith.j.kr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 9:49 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão > > > <jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:43 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, at 18:33, Weston Pace wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:18 AM Wes McKinney < > wesmck...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 6:20 PM Antoine Pitrou < > > anto...@python.org > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to propose clarifying the allowed value range > for > > > the > > > > > Time > > > > > > > > types. Specifically, I would propose that: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) allowed values fall between 0 (included) and 86400 seconds > > > > > > > > (excluded), adjusted for the time unit; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) leap seconds cannot be represented (see above: 86400 is > > > outside of > > > > > > > > the range of allowed values). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the proposed clarification > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the proposed clarification because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote is +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If this proposal is accepted, I will submit a PR to enhance > > > > > Schema.fbs > > > > > > > > with additional comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > > > >
