+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:57 PM Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:29 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:13 PM QP Hou <q...@scribd.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > > > Really exciting stuff, amazing work Jorge. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:32 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 as well (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 28/06/2021 à 17:28, Ben Kietzman a écrit : > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 5:35 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > > >> > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:08 AM Daniël Heres < > > danielhe...@gmail.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> +1 (non binding) > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Great work Jorge! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, 10:26 Weston Steimel < > > weston.stei...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> +1 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Sun, 27 Jun 2021, 07:41 Jorge Cardoso Leitão, < > > > > >> jorgecarlei...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Hi, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I would like to bring to this mailing list a proposal to donate > > the > > > > >>>> source > > > > >>>>> code of arrow2 [1] and parquet2 [2] as experimental repositories > > > [3] > > > > >>>> within > > > > >>>>> Apache Arrow, conditional on IP clearance. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The specific PRs are: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> * https://github.com/apache/arrow-experimental-rs-arrow2/pull/1 > > > > >>>>> * > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-experimental-rs-parquet2/pull/1 > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The source code contains rewrites of the arrow and parquet crates > > > > >> with > > > > >>>>> safety and security in mind. In particular, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> * no buffer transmutes > > > > >>>>> * no unsafe APIs marked as safe > > > > >>>>> * parquet's implementation is unsafe free > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> There are many other important features, such as big endian > > support > > > > >> and > > > > >>>> IPC > > > > >>>>> 2.0 support. There is one regression over latest: support nested > > > > >> types in > > > > >>>>> parquet read and write. I observe no negative impact on > > > performance. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> See a longer discussion in [4] over the reasons why the current > > > rust > > > > >>>>> implementation is susceptible to safety violations. In > > particular, > > > > >> many > > > > >>>>> core APIs of the crate are considered security vulnerabilities > > > under > > > > >>>>> RustSec's [5] definitions, and are difficult to address on its > > > > >> current > > > > >>>>> design. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I validated that it is possible to migrate DataFusion [6] and > > > Polars > > > > >> [7] > > > > >>>>> without further code changes. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Accept the code donation as experimental repos. > > > > >>>>> [ ] +0 > > > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not accept the code donation as experimental repos > > > > >> because... > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> [1] > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/docs/source/developers/experimental_repos.rst > > > > >>>>> [2] https://github.com/jorgecarleitao/arrow2 > > > > >>>>> [3] https://github.com/jorgecarleitao/parquet2 > > > > >>>>> [4] https://github.com/jorgecarleitao/arrow2#faq > > > > >>>>> [5] https://rustsec.org/ > > > > >>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/68 > > > > >>>>> [7] https://github.com/pola-rs/polars > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
