+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:53 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 08:30, Jonathan Keane wrote: > > +1 > > > > -Jon > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:30 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Eduardo Ponce <edponc...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM Joris Peeters > > > > <joris.mg.peet...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Joris Van den Bossche < > > > > > jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 21:21, Micah Kornfield > > > > > > <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:17 PM Weston Pace > > > > > > > <weston.p...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I > > > > > > > > would > > > > > like > > > > > > > > to submit for a vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the time zone property. > > > > This > > > > > > > > has caused confusion because some people have interpreted a > > > > timestamp > > > > > > > > without a time zone to be an Instant while others have > > > > > > > > interpreted > > > > it > > > > > > > > to be a LocalDateTime. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This proposal is to clarify the Arrow schema (via comments) and > > > > > assert > > > > > > > > that a timestamp without a time zone should be interpreted as > > > > > > > > LocalDateTime. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: For definitions of Instant and LocalDateTime (and a > > > > discussion > > > > > > > > on the semantics) please refer to [3] > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For sample arguments for/against see [2]. For a summary of > > > > > > > > some of > > > > > > > > the discussion in [1] and a detailed discussion about the > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > temporal concepts see [3]. A related straw poll (and eventual > > > > vote) > > > > > > > > will be sent regarding treatment of instants as potential Arrow > > > > > types. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Update comments in schema.fbs to assert the above > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not make any change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8216e5de3efd2935e3907ad9bd20ce07e430952f84de69b36337e5eb%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > [2]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wDAuxEDVo3YxZx20fGUGqQxi3aoss7TJ-TzOUjaoZk8/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > [3]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDwX4ypfNvESc2ywcT1ygaf2Y1R8SmkpifMV7gpJdBI/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
