Hi Antoine, In regards to conceptual simplicity, I might have misinterpreted when you wrote:
Since complex numbers are quite common in some domains, and since they > are conceptually simply, It seemed like a justification for adding them as a first class type. Thanks, Micah On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:16 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > Le 10/06/2021 à 00:05, Micah Kornfield a écrit : > >> > >> While dedicated types are not strictly required, compute functions would > >> be much easier to add for a first-class dedicated complex datatype > >> rather than for an extension type. > > > > It seems like maybe this is an area to focus on? I'm not sure > conceptually > > simple is the right criteria to apply here. > > Hmm... who talked about conceptual simplicitly? I was alluding to > potentially adding compute kernels to Arrow C++ applying to complex data. > > Regards > > Antoine. >
