Hi,
> Do you think we should rename the existing arrow-4.1.0 directory or just
> use the new name going forward?
How about renaming the existing arrow-4.1.0 directory if we
need to release Apache Arrow 4.1.0? (I don't think that we
need to release Apache Arrow 4.1.0.)
Thanks,
--
kou
In <CAFhtnRzcjhgc3P2ym2K-TZ937atiOzF-Y=f8m5u-ng4zu3c...@mail.gmail.com>
"Re: Release archive URL" on Thu, 27 May 2021 06:36:48 -0400,
Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> Using a different prefix sounds like a good idea to me. I don't have any
> preference between apache-arrow{-rs} and arrow-{rs}
>
> I am happy to make that change for future Rust releases if others agree.
>
> Do you think we should rename the existing arrow-4.1.0 directory or just
> use the new name going forward?
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 8:58 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that we use "arrow-" prefix for both Apache Arrow
>> release and Apache Arrow Rust release:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/
>>
>> > KEYS
>> > arrow-3.0.0/
>> > arrow-4.0.0/
>> > arrow-4.0.1/
>> > arrow-4.1.0/
>>
>> How about using "arrow-rs-" for Apache Arrow Rust like
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/ ?
>>
>> (Should we use "apache-arrow-" prefix and "apache-arrow-rs-"
>> prefix like https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/ ?)
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> kou
>>
