Hi,

I have started collecting commits to the maint branch [1]. The exact
commands I used:

git clone g...@github.com:apache/arrow.git
cd arrow/dev
python3 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -e archery
pip install GitPython jira semver jinja2
archery release cherry-pick 4.0.1
# ran the commands it printed one by one

There is a commit that does not apply cleanly. Could someone from C++ merge
it? What to do:

Run `git fetch upstream && git checkout maint-4.0.x && git cherry-pick
ce2861713472818eea264957de4cc83d5a2c567c`

This will trigger a merge conflict. Resolve and push to maint-4.0.x on
apache/arrow.

Thanks,
Jorge

https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/maint-4.0.x



On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 1:23 AM Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for taking this on. Krisztián can confirm the details (or point you
> to where this is documented), but based on past patch releases, I believe
> you would make a `maint-4.0.x` branch off of the existing `release-4.0.0`
> branch, cherry-pick the commits associated with the JIRAs tagged for 4.0.1
> (I believe there are utility scripts to help with this), and run the
> release script that bumps the versions.
>
> Neal
>
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:32 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão <
> jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to make sure: the goal is to cherry-pick all changes targeted for
> > 4.0.1 into a branch and release from there? If that is the case, then I
> > will create a branch and start cherry-picking the changes in order they
> > were merged in master.
> >
> > I see 5 issues on the list still open. I subscribed to them and will be
> > cherry-picking them as they get merged.
> >
> > On the Rust side; we can either bump 4.1.0 or cherry-pick for a 4.0.1. I
> > suggest 4.0.1 to keep parity as we recently agreed, but let me know if
> > others disagree.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/289
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:54 PM Neal Richardson <
> > neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Jorge!
> > >
> > > If anyone else has bugfixes that they'd like included in a patch
> release,
> > > please tag them with the 4.0.1 Fix Version. Perhaps we can do a roundup
> > and
> > > start a vote early next week?
> > >
> > > Neal
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:20 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Addressing these accumulated issues in a patch release sounds like a
> > > > good idea to me.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 6:18 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão
> > > > <jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree. Segfaults are not nice.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can take it. I would possibly need some guidance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Jorge
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:52 AM Neal Richardson <
> > > > > neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > As discussed at the biweekly sync call, I wanted to gauge
> interest
> > in
> > > > doing
> > > > > > a 4.0.1 patch release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There currently are 14 issues in JIRA tagged with 4.0.1 [1].
> There
> > > are
> > > > 3
> > > > > > segfaults, including one that a cuDF maintainer raised yesterday
> > [2]
> > > in
> > > > > > requesting a patch release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't want to bias the discussion by giving my opinion (yet). I
> > > will
> > > > say
> > > > > > that the question is whether someone (or multiple people) wants
> to
> > > > step up
> > > > > > and drive a release--if releases were costless, this would be
> much
> > > > > > different. We did decide to allow for a simpler patch release
> > process
> > > > > > (source vote only, not on binary artifacts), so this could be a
> > test
> > > > for
> > > > > > whether that does simplify matters and/or lets us better
> distribute
> > > the
> > > > > > work of producing binary artifacts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any thoughts--especially from those who could/would be release
> > > manager?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Neal
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ARROW%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.0.1
> > > > > > [2]:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9444ad73db11fe071a59ef5c084c6d1a02d26d55d23320ea8e0a67ae%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to