>
> Indeed, I don't think it was discussed publicly.  The LZ4 frame format
> has several things going for it:
> - it allows streaming compression and decompression (meaning you can
> avoid loading a huge compressed buffer at once)

Is this something we make use of or intend to make use of?


> - it embeds the decompressed size, allowing exact allocation of the
> decompressed buffer

IIUC, We already do this in the IPC specification (the first 8 bytes of the
compressed buffer are used for this).

- it has an optional checksum

This seems like a good thing, so probably worth keeping (although it would
be the only place where we do checksums today).

Is https://github.com/lz4/lz4-java the fast Java lz4 library in
> question?

Yes it is.



On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:12 AM Joris Peeters <joris.mg.peet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> "Is https://github.com/lz4/lz4-java the fast Java lz4 library in
> question? The incompleteness of this implementation is a known problem
> for other user communities, not only Arrow. It would be a great public
> service to improve it so that it fully implements the lz4 frame
> specification."
>
> Very much +1.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:08 PM Steve Kim <chairm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I prefer the lz4 frame format for the reasons that Antoine stated.
> >
> > To be friendly to users, the Arrow IPC documentation could mention
> > that lz4 compression may break Java interoperability. If block
> > dependency is the only obstacle to Java interoperability, the Arrow
> > IPC implementation could disable this flag as an _implementation
> > detail_. But I think that the _specification_ of lz4 compression in
> > the Arrow IPC format should not carve out exceptions to accommodate
> > current (temporary, I hope) implementation shortfalls in lz4
> > libraries.
> >
> > Is https://github.com/lz4/lz4-java the fast Java lz4 library in
> > question? The incompleteness of this implementation is a known problem
> > for other user communities, not only Arrow. It would be a great public
> > service to improve it so that it fully implements the lz4 frame
> > specification.
> >
> > Steve
> >
>

Reply via email to