On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 17:39, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:

>
> Le 15/12/2020 à 17:24, Joris Van den Bossche a écrit :
> >
> > But, most of the additional ConvertedTypes that were not present in
> > parquet-format 1.0 (eg the different signed/unsigned integer types,
> > timestamp, ..) were introduced in parquet-format 2.2 (
> > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/3,
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-12) almost 7 years ago.
>
> Surely you mean "1.2"?
>

No, I actually mean 2.2. (I don't think a 1.2 version exists, at least
according to the git tags)
You can compare the thrift file for version 2.1 (
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/parquet-format-2.1.0/src/thrift/parquet.thrift)
vs 2.2 (
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/apache-parquet-format-2.2.0/src/thrift/parquet.thrift),
in which a set of ConvertedTypes where added.


>
> > If so, could we start defaulting to version 2.0 (but still with date page
> > version 1.0), or do other parquet readers actually not yet support the
> > ConvertedTypes introduced 7 years ago?
>
> +1 for defaulting to 2.0.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>

Reply via email to