Hi Micah,

Thanks for the answer! yeah basically that was my question, I was not
sure about the full extent of support for nested data, but it seems
that both (parquet binding and arrow format) do reading/writing nested
objects.

Just a couple of follow up questions:
- If Arrow/Feather file format do not use Parquet's FSM for
reading/writing arbitrarily nested objects, what was the approach
taken? is there a PR or JIRA issue I could look at?
- Could you please point me to some docs (or source code) where I can
read more about how reading/writing arbitrarily nested objects is
done?

Thanks again for your help!
Best,

Renato M.

El mié., 11 nov. 2020 a las 21:23, Micah Kornfield
(<emkornfi...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> Hi Renato,
> I'm not clear if you are asking if the Arrow/Feather file format support
> this or if Arrow's parquet binding support it.
>
> Regardless, both formats as of 2.0.0 now support arbitrarily nested data
> (there were some bugs discovered after the 2.0.0 release, and I just
> started a discussion on dev@ to see if we are going to do a patch release.
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:21 AM Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <
> renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Arrow experts,
> >
> > I am trying to find out if Arrow supports reading/writing arbitrary
> > nested objects similarly to what Parquet supports with its FSM.
> > I came across this PR https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4066 which
> > aimed to implement the Parquet specific approach (the FSM) but it was
> > declined because as far as I understand it was too Parquet specific.
> > Then, there is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1644 which
> > tracks the tasks related to writing nested objects, but I couldn't
> > make sense of it all.
> >
> > Basically my question is: Does arrow provide the functionality of
> > reading/writing arbitrarily nested objects (similar to Parquet's FSM
> > implementation)? Could you please point me to some documentation or
> > code for this?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Renato M.
> >

Reply via email to