On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:07 AM James Duong <jam...@bitquilltech.com> wrote: > > I can go ahead and make the change, but should this get force pushed > earlier in the history to be right after the Arrow 2 commit that was tagged? Something most have gone wrong during the maven release preparation. `mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=3.0.0-SNAPSHOT` should set up the versions properly.
If we want to be pedantic then a rebase would be nice, but it may be distracting for contributors since they would need to rebase their PRs as well. I'd say that we can omit it. > > The reason I ran into this was that I had a local build of master which had > interface changes that weren't in the Arrow 2 maven artifacts. > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020, 19:08 Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The parts of the release process involving Maven are brittle and error > > prone, so it probably just didn't flow through properly, or the commit > > updating the Java POM versions didn't get pushed to the release branch > > or something similar > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:12 PM James Duong <jam...@bitquilltech.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I noticed that in the Java POM files, the version in master is still > > 2.0.0 > > > even after the release. This patch updated versions to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT in > > > other languages: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/b1f36acca85d0845c1e64c0a3270651d4a1467b7 > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *James Duong* > > > Lead Software Developer > > > Bit Quill Technologies Inc. > > > Direct: +1.604.562.6082 | jam...@bitquilltech.com > > > https://www.bitquilltech.com > > > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > > may > > > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, > > > use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > > > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy > > > all copies of the original message. Thank you. > >
