Or perhaps we (meaning James :-)) can add an #ifdef-based switch.

There's no need to penalize users of older gRPCs for a rather optional
feature (if you can call disabling a security verification a feature, of
course ;-)).

Regards

Antoine.


Le 07/10/2020 à 21:33, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> Given Google's "live at head" mantra, in principle I don't have a
> problem with requiring a < 1 year old version of gRPC
> 
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:23 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 07/10/2020 à 21:19, James Duong a écrit :
>>> Hi Neal,
>>>
>>> Are you the release manager for 2.0?
>>> I've been working on the task to disable server verification in Flight
>>> clients, and it appears we'll need
>>> to update the minimum gRPC version to at least 1.27 to support this.
>>>
>>> Would it be OK to do this for the 2.0. release? It looks like we also need
>>> to update Ursa configurations here:
>>> https://github.com/ursa-labs/ursabot/blob/e958c5f95b31e98108df54cf13596c4fde944c3a/projects/arrow/docker/conda-cpp.txt#L19
>>
>> IMHO that implies a lot of potential issues to watch for, at the last
>> minute before a release.  Personally, I'd rather see this in 3.0.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antoine.

Reply via email to