Since the TCP/networking stack is different between Linux and Windows, I would certainly expect the performance to be *different* but I'm not sure of the expected magnitude of the difference. I'm copying dev@ in case someone knows more about gRPC and TCP performance on Windows. There might be some default gRPC settings which should be set differently on Windows to achieve better performance out of the box
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:36 AM Louis C <l...@outlook.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > I compiled the flight benchmarks on windows (using vcpkg and adding some > options to the port file because it is not done by default), version 1.0.0. > While running it I only get about 700 MB/s max with the default parameters. > My CPU is i7-4790K, with 32Gb of Ram (ddr3) at 1600 Mhz. > However I see that in the blog post concerning Flight, the performance which > is reached is about 3GB/s. > Does such a difference in performance seems normal to you ? > Example of output : > >arrow-flight-benchmark.exe > Using standalone server: false > Server running with pid 27500 > Testing method: DoGet > Server host: localhost > Server port: 31337 > Server host: localhost > Server port: 31337 > Batch size: 131040 > Batches read: 9768 > Bytes read: 1280000000 > Nanos: 2737466000 > Speed: 445.924 MB/s > Throughput: 3568.26 batches/s > Latency: 948.912 usec/batch > I also tested on similar machines, with similar performances (I reach 1.2GB/s > max on more recent computers (windows) ) > > Cheers, > Louis C
