Le 14/07/2020 à 19:40, Ben Kietzman a écrit : > string -> date32 is not implemented, AFAICT. > > I agree that a timestamp seems ideal, that way string -> date32 should > produce the same result as string -> timestamp -> date32. > > A related question: what format would be expected for time32<seconds> <-> > string?
"HH:MM:SS" perhaps?
