I just submitted https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7697 to update Docs for Java type support for 1.0.0, docs probably are not a blocker but should be an easy review.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:19 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi David -- I agree with you, I just set ARROW-9265 to a Blocker and > will spend some time reviewing today. We also need to validate and > document the expected workflow for PySpark users who upgrade to > pyarrow=1.x and need to run in a Spark cluster that's using an older > Arrow Java library > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:44 PM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I would submit that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9265 > > and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9362 should also be > > considered blockers, or users are going to have a hard time migrating. > > Also, without these PRs, no implementation currently actually writes > > V5 metadata by default. > > > > Best, > > David > > > > On 7/9/20, Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > Following up on this. Are we still on track to cut a release candidate > on > > > Monday? > > > > > > Some specific calls to action: > > > > > > * Looking at the release wiki page ( > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+1.0.0+Release > ), > > > there are still 58 unstarted issues tagged for 1.0. Half of those are > Rust > > > issues that haven't been updated in over a month, so I suspect they > aren't > > > going to get resolved this week. Please do review the backlog and bump > to > > > 2.0 anything that isn't going to happen now. > > > > > > * There are also 5 issues listed as blockers. It's not clear to me that > > > they're necessarily release blocking, that they're worth holding this > > > release for, but if you feel strongly that they do and need more time > to > > > get them done, please speak up. > > > > > > * It appears that the various format changes from the past couple of > weeks > > > have gone through, and remaining tasks are not labeled as blockers. If > > > there is something that you think *should* be considered a blocker, > please > > > indicate it as one. > > > > > > Neal > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:09 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> hi folks, > > >> > > >> I hope you and your families are all well. > > >> > > >> We're heading into a holiday weekend here in the US -- I would guess > > >> given the state of the backlog and nightly builds that the earliest we > > >> could contemplate making the release will be the week of July 13. That > > >> should give enough time next week to resolve the code changes related > > >> to the Format votes under way along with other things that come up. > > >> > > >> In the meantime, if all stakeholders could please review the 1.0.0 > > >> backlog and remove issues that you do not believe will be completed in > > >> the next 10 days with > 0.5 probability, that would be very helpful to > > >> know where things stand viz-a-viz cutting an RC > > >> > > >> Thank you, > > >> Wes > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:21 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > hi folks, > > >> > > > >> > Based on the previous discussions about release timelines, the > window > > >> > for the next major release would be around the week of July 6. Does > > >> > this sound reasonable? > > >> > > > >> > I see that Neal has created a wiki page to help track the burndown > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+1.0.0+Release > > >> > > > >> > There are currently 214 issues in the 1.0.0 backlog. Some of these > are > > >> > indeed blockers based on the criteria we've indicated for making the > > >> > 1.0.0 release. Would project stakeholders please review their parts > of > > >> > the backlog and remove issues that aren't likely to be completed in > > >> > the next 21 days? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Wes > > >> > > > >
