>
> That said, if big-endian developers would assist with
> other parts of the C++ project as a sort of "quid-pro-quo" to balance
> the time spent on code review relating to big-endian that would be
> helpful.

I think setting/resetting up setting up CI would need to be included in
this, otherwise even with in-depth reviews, I think it will be easy to
forget about big endian architectures.

An additional
> problem is that, without any Continuous Integration set up, it will be
> impossible to ensure progress and be notified of regressions.

This might be hijacking the thread, but I think we might have similar
issues for AVX-512 specific code?

Thanks,
Micah


On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:10 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I will add that I think big-endian support would be valuable so that
> the library can be used everywhere, including more exotic mainframe
> type systems like IBM Z.
>
> That said, the code review burden to other C++ developers is likely to
> become significant, so a solo developer with access to big-endian
> hardware submitting pull requests could be problematic since no one
> else with close knowledge of the codebase has a need to support
> big-endian. That said, if big-endian developers would assist with
> other parts of the C++ project as a sort of "quid-pro-quo" to balance
> the time spent on code review relating to big-endian that would be
> helpful.
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:38 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently some issues have been opened for big-endian support (i.e.
> > support for big-endian *hosts*), and a couple patches submitted, thanks
> > to Kazuaki Ishizaki.  See e.g.:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8457
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8467
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8486
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8506
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1845
> >
> > Achieving big-endian support support accross the C++ Arrow and Parquet
> > codebases is likely to be a very significant effort, potentially
> > requiring cooperation between multiple developers.  An additional
> > problem is that, without any Continuous Integration set up, it will be
> > impossible to ensure progress and be notified of regressions.
> >
> > If other people are seriously interested in the desired outcome, they
> > should probably team up with Kazuaki Ishizaki and discuss a practical
> > plan to avoid drowning in the difficulties.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
>

Reply via email to