Hi,

Krisztián, thanks for collecting the problems!

> *PREPARE_CHANGELOG* phase:
> 
> - need to set ARROW_HOME because changelog.py requires it

https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6975

> - changelog.py stopped working since adding support for parquet tickets [1],
> because it requires the actual version to have a git tag, which is not yet
> available during the release procedure (called from prepare.sh)

We can test PREPARE_CHANGELOG phase by
dev/release/00-prepare-test.rb if dev/release/changelog.py
doesn't require JIRA account.

> - on OSX brew installed ORC doesn't work so need to use the bundled source,
> passing `-DORC_SOURCE=BUNDLED` fixes it

I may take a look at this later.

> - for me only OpenJDK 8 and Maven 3.5 version combination works, with newer
> versions the build fails once a javadoc another time with an unknown error

I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5764
for this about a year ago. But nobody works on this yet.
Could any Java developer work on this?

> [Packaging][deb] Support RC version numbers for apache-arrow-archive-keyring 
> [4]

Sorry. I've fixed this:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/3e1680ed2a0d62ab3d86c32f53a942af4fefcc5d

> [Packaging][rpm] Fix CentOS 6 build [5]

Sorry again. I've fixed this too:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/37bf6e3a5b17da9c5328f173de2d6577921a429a


Thanks,
--
kou

In <CAHM19a5wXT4ULVVesE+FPZ_4M=rah1mwofdi-sezwwh7hcs...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Thoughts and issues regarding the release procedure" on Fri, 17 Apr 2020 
03:51:36 +0200,
  Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> While our release scripts have improved a lot lately, cutting the first 
> release
> candidate still takes multiple days. I wouldn't consider the overall 
> experience
> bad - especially given the complexity of the project and the number of
> artifacts we produce - but we definitely need to develop more automatisms and
> tests supporting it.
> I'm not sure what's the right way to have an action plan, but having more
> manpower here would be great.
> 
> If you don't mind, I'd like to specially thank Kou for maintaining most of the
> release scripts and (when not being the RM) always helping out with the
> upcoming issues, I really appreciate it.
> 
> I tried to collect the problems, inconveniences I had with 0.17.0-RC0:
> 
> 00-prepare.sh
> -------------
> 
> *PREPARE_CHANGELOG* phase:
> 
> - need to set ARROW_HOME because changelog.py requires it
> - changelog.py stopped working since adding support for parquet tickets [1],
> because it requires the actual version to have a git tag, which is not yet
> available during the release procedure (called from prepare.sh)
> 
> Extra *PREPARE_DEB_PACKAGE_NAMES* phase:
> 
> This is usually not required but the previous `so` versions were set to .100,
> so I had to downgrade them:
> 
> ```bash
> PREPARE_DEFAULT=0 PREPARE_DEB_PACKAGE_NAMES=1 \
> dev/release/00-prepare.sh 1.0.0 0.17.0
> ```
> 
> We should add this step to ensure that the so versions in the linux package
> are properly set, and also consider to remove the previous version from the
> pattern.
> 
> *PREPARE_TAG* phase:
> 
> The outstanding issue was the JNI ORC crash we have discussed on the mailing
> list and I have a reproducer PR available for [6]. I had to `@Ignore` the
> crashing test to be able to release.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> - on OSX brew installed ORC doesn't work so need to use the bundled source,
> passing `-DORC_SOURCE=BUNDLED` fixes it
> - need to update the maven versions to match <version>-SNAPSHOT with command
> `mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=0.17.0-SNAPSHOT`
> - gandiva has deprication warnings, which was complicating the debugging of
> the java jni orc problem [2]
> - for me only OpenJDK 8 and Maven 3.5 version combination works, with newer
> versions the build fails once a javadoc another time with an unknown error
> - if I rerun the script without removing the version tag then the maven
> process raises an error *after* compiling everything again, effectively
> losing 20 minutes.
> 
> I'm generally frustrated about the compile time required iterate with the 
> maven
> build issues - I suppose there are better ways to invoke maven which I'm not
> aware of. It would be nice to have a Java developer guide listing the
> recommended
> commands in certain scenarios.
> 
> Another thing I dislike about the release procedure is that the source code
> tagging is done by / centered around maven. Preferably I would like to fire 
> the
> `git tag` command explicitly rather than letting one of the many
> package managers
> to do it implicitly.
> 
> 02-source.sh
> ------------
> 
> The previous step produces a directory with the same name as the tag:
> apache-arrow-0.17.0 which makes the script failing [3]
> 
> Binary Packaging
> ----------------
> 
> I had to apply two patches to fix the linux packaging builds.
> 
> [Packaging][deb] Support RC version numbers for apache-arrow-archive-keyring 
> [4]
> The packaging scripts were not properly supporting the -RC0 postfixed version
> number which is a special case because the linux binaries are built agains
> the apache source release rather than a git tag. While I managed to fix it,
> we probably need a follow-up after the rebase.
> 
> [Packaging][rpm] Fix CentOS 6 build [5]
> This issue has surfaced today with the nightly builds as well, seems like
> devtoolset-6 is no longer available for CentOS 6 so I had to update it.
> 
> Building the 4 windows wheels on Appveyor takes 4 hours, because we don't have
> any parallelism there. We should port the windows scripts to either Azure or
> Github Actions.
> 
> 
> Looking forward to the improvement ideas!
> 
> Thanks Everyone!
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/636a912c4bef6803fe3fede8a050d82124b18136#diff-fc9c73b2cf4e254206ac116714cfdbf4
> [2] https://gist.github.com/kszucs/08b1582ca60a86c8dd8a1ab50bb6faad
> [3] https://gist.github.com/kszucs/3337e475ce751cfbf11ea45a5a8817d2
> [4] 
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/2c4cb4576a04b930a295ce6838179a8cf5a16058
> [5] 
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/0b245aa3404bf016488e36e22a0140813b661f40
> [6] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6953

Reply via email to